Warwick Township: Compstat
Warwick Township Municipal Building Welcome to Warwick Township (Lancaster County, PA)
Sign up for eAlerts!
Contact Us
Community Watch Alerts
View sub-linksAbout Us
View sub-linksAdministration
View sub-linksPolice Department
View sub-linksMunicipal Authority
View sub-linksPublic Works Department
View sub-linksParks & Recreation
View sub-linksRecycling
L.R.W.A.
Hide sub-linksW.E.S.A.
Administrator
WESA Strategic Plan
Members
Meeting Schedule
Action Plan
Fire & Ambulance Co. News
VOLUNTEER
Fire Police Use Form
911 Reflective Address Markers-order form
Lancaster County Gov't Homepage
Calendar of Events
View as Text-Only
Home
Log into the Warwick Township Website Register for an Account


Warwick Township Home  Back  Printable Version  Text-Only  Full-Screen  eMail  Previous  Next

 WARWICK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT

COMPSTAT (Comparable Statistics)

 

   A crime analysis and police management process developed by the New York City Police Department, COMPSTAT is summarized briefly as follows: Collect, analyze and map crime data and other essential police performance measures on a regular basis and hold police managers and officers accountable for their performance as measured by these data.  The Warwick Township Police department uses this management process to measure our success in bringing the crime rate down in our community.  The philosophy of COMPSTAT is deceptively simple.  It is based on four principles which have proved to be essential ingredients of an effective crime-fighting strategy; namely:

  • ACCURATE & TIMELY INTELLIGENCE – Effective crime-fighting requires accurate and timely intelligence.  Officers at all levels of the police department must understand when (time of day, day of week, etc.) various types of crime have been committed as well as how, where, and by whom they have been committed.
        
  • EFFECTIVE TACTICS - Having collated, analyzed and mapped this crime intelligence, the supervisors must develop effective tactics for dealing with the problems it reveals.  In order to bring about permanent change in crime conditions, these tactics must be comprehensive, flexible, and adaptable to changing trends.  They must involve the cooperation of other law enforcement agencies when needed, such as the district attorney’s office, probation services, other local law enforcement, our citizens, as well as the FBI, DEA, and ATF
        
  • RAPID DEPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL & RESOURCES – Once a tactical plan has been developed the deployment of personnel and resources must be rapid and focused.  To be effective, the response to a crime or quality of life problem demands that patrol officers coordinate their resources and expertise and act with a sense of urgency.
        
  • RELENTLESS FOLLOW-UP & ASSESSMENT – All action must be relentlessly followed-up and assessed to ensure that the desired results has been achieved.  This is the only way of ensuring that recurring or similar problems are dealt with effectively in the future.

   COMPSTAT has been shown throughout the United States to work in all size agencies, from the large agencies to the ones with two or three officers.  It is a complete shift in paradigms (a complete change of thinking or a complete different approach to a problem or issue), each member of the police department is an important facet for this program to work.

   As of now our department has phased into operation the Community Oriented Policing philosophy and this has done us good; however, it is difficult to supervise, has a little accountability, and is very difficult to measure the success.

   COMPSTAT is basically an application of the Broken Windows theory, aided by crime analysis, and using the SARA model (Scan, Analyze, Respond, and Assess).  COMPSTAT is not a crime solving program, but a management process.  It is a process of identifying problems and measuring the results of the problem solving efforts.  Officers and middle managers hold the key to this process. 

________________

_________
       

   The police department, through computer programs and detailed police reporting will process statistics on all crimes within the municipality.  Included in this process will be traffic problems, crash areas, the time officer’s spend doing community relations programs, the time an officer works on specialized enforcement (seatbelt details, speed enforcement, etc.), routine patrol, drug investigations, quality of life calls, and any other crime information that is pertinent.

   Mid-level managers (sergeants) will be responsible for assisting in the implementation of COMPSTAT.  It will be the sergeants who will see that officers out on patrol are submitting detailed information and that detailed approved reports are being submitted to be processed by staff members.

Police supervisors are encouraged to be creative with their officers.  If the plan requires saturation of an area, and we have extra personnel, go for it.  If it calls for plainclothes, or bike patrols, or a walking beat, go for it.

   The ultimate action of COMPSTAT is to bring the crime rate down.  That’s really what were pushing for, and with your help and ideas, this can be accomplished.  Issues and problems that come up are handed with professional responsibility, and accountability, with the tactical use of limited resources.

__________________

__________

    
WARWICK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT

STATISTICAL INFORMATION

2008
(updated 5/6/2009)

CRIME INFORMATION
Total Calls for Service (Department generated) 
1,719
Total Calls for Service (Count Event#) 
6,957
Alarm Calls
214
Domestic Violence Cases
91

TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION  & ACCIDENT INFORMATION
Fatal Accidents
1
Reportable Accidents
131
Injury Accidents
62
Vehicle Towed
142
Non-Reportable Accidents
144
Total Accidents
275
Traffic Citations Issued
1,154
Traffic Warnings Issued
348

____________________

_________

Part 1 crimes consist of the eight major crimes of Murder, Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault, Burglary, Theft, Motor Vehicle Theft and Arson.  All other criminal offenses, including summary offenses are considered as Part 2 crimes according to the Federal Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCR).
    

 

DEPARTMENT UCR PART 1 CRIMES – 96

CRIMES

CLEARANCE 

Murder
 0
 0
Rape 
 1
 0
Robbery
 4
 1
Aggravated Assault
13
 10
Burglary
15
 7
Theft
65
 19
MV Theft
 3
 0
Arson
 0
 0
 
 

DEPARTMENT UCR PART 2 CRIMES – 205

CRIMES 

CLEARANCE 

Forgery
3
 1
Fraud
31
 17
Embezzlement
0
 0
Rec. Stolen property
1
 1
Criminal Mischief
36
 4
Weapons Violation
2
 1
Sex Offenses
3
 2
Drug Violations
7
 4
Gambling
0
 0
Off. Against Family
0
 0
D.U.I.
27
 27
Liquor Law Violations
7
 8
Public Drunk
15
 15
Disorderly Conducts
9
 9
Vagrancy
0
 0
Others
34
 37

____________

                
Police departments clear a crime when they actually arrest and charge a person or persons for committing a crime, or when for some exceptional reason, they can positively identify a person who has committed a crime but do not actually charge this person with this crime.  E
xamples of exceptional clearances of crimes would be if the suspect who committed the crime has now been arrested in another state and the extradition of this person would serve no further purpose, or if the person who had committed this crime is now deceased.

        

CRIME FACTORS:
1. Population Density

2. Composition of Population

  • Number of Youth
  • Number of Elderly
3. Economic conditions
  • Median Income
  • Job Availability
4. Cultural Conditions
  • Education
  • Religious
  • Recreational
5. Family Conditions

6. Law Enforcement Strength

                                                                  

                                                        

                          

DEPARTMENT U.C.R. STATISTICS       

 
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Part 1 Crimes
75
109
95
117
124
96
116
96
101
Part 2  Crimes
218
149
193
222
274
232
220
205
175
Totals
293
258
288
339
398
328
336
301
276
 

     


 

        

TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS

 
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Reportable
151
141
150
148
142
151
154
150
131
Non-Reportable
69
108
118
176
185
177
127
141
144
Total Accidents
220
249
268
324
327
328
281
291
275


  

 

 

 

                          
TRAFFIC CITATIONS / WARNINGS COMPARISON

TYPE
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Traffic Citations
587
995
707
701
980
1,154
Traffic Warnings
346
421
255
218
163
348

    

        

 

 

 

           

PART 1 UCR COMPARISON

CRIMES
 2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Murder
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Rape
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
Robbery
0
3
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
Aggravated Assault
10
15
13
11
20
7
13
15
13
Burglary
11
13
12
26
15
11
8
13
15
Theft
54
69
64
76
80
72
85
61
65
MV Theft
2
7
6
2
7
3
9
5
3
Arson
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

 
                 
STATISTICAL COMPARISONS
2006 - 2009
January through June
(updated 7/8/09)
CALLS FOR SERVICE
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
510
516
455
571
February
509
485
469
566
March
490
576
537
732
April
440
476
493
590
May
540
630
598
568
June
605
529
616
577
Total to date
3094
3212
3168
3604
 
 
TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS ISSUED
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
43
39
31
32
February
72
54
84
38
March
47
131
154
164
April
34
37
158
80
May
158
202
158
89
June
126
57
108
207
Total to date
480
520
693
610
 
 
TRAFFIC WARNINGS ISSUED
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
23
18
19
7
February
47
14
24
15
March
26
17
26
49
April
29
18
53
16
May
12
7
53
21
June
12
13
48
28
Total to date
149
87
223
136
 
 
SUMMARY ARRESTS MADE
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
8
7
6
7
February
4
4
3
2
March
7
10
7
5
April
18
5
2
6
May
6
15
13
7
June
12
21
21
12
Total to date
55
62
52
39
 
 
DUI ARRESTS
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
4
3
2
3
February
3
2
2
5
March
6
3
1
4
April
4
2
3
3
May
3
4
2
3
June
5
3
2
5
Total to date
25
17
12
23
 
 
CRIMINAL ARRESTS
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
16
14
8
7
February
15
10
9
13
March
17
23
9
16
April
29
19
12
11
May
15
20
39
12
June
13
37
32
16
Total to date
105
123
99
75
 
 
POLICE VEHICLES MILEAGE
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
16,192
15,017
14,751
12,338
February
14,798
14,398
14,091
12,848
March
17,785
15,098
15,824
13,443
April
14,630
16,469
16,963
12,953
May
19,362
17,140
19,588
12,595
June
17,829
14,955
15,793
11,982
Total to date
100,596
93,077
97,010
76,159
 
 
ITEMS STOLEN ($)
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
$2,928
$6,257
$2,330
$2,030
February
$556
$5,892
$27,905
$1,131
March
$5,346
$7,499
$2,584
$4,253
April
$3,364
$4,740
$14,122
$20,577
May
$24,261
$2,108
$26,805
$379
June
$1,888
$19,661
$4,452
$4,087
Total to date
$38,343
$46,157
$78,198
$32,457
 
 
ITEMS RECOVERED ($)
2006
2007
2008
2009
January
$50
$2,000
$0
$0
February
$69
$3,299
$25,000
$11
March
$0
$0
$7
$550
April
$1,800
$17
$0
$0
May
$15,160
$0
$1,112
$6
June
$0
$2,000
$150
$500
Total to date
$17,079
$7,316
$26,269
$1,067
 
 
 




Content Last Modified on 7/8/2009 9:01:53 AM



Warwick Township Home  Back  Printable Version  Text-Only  Full-Screen  eMail  Previous  Next



315 Clay Road
P.O. Box 308
Lititz, PA 17543-0308
(717) 626-8900
(717) 626-8901 fax

Send technical questions to webmaster@co.lancaster.pa.us

Send content questions to Warwick Twp.

Copyright © 2001 County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer